Tuesday, November 15, 2005
11/15/2005 5:33:09 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Monday, November 14, 2005
11/14/2005 9:24:29 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Sunday, November 13, 2005

http://www.agileprogrammer.com/dotnetguy/archive/2005/11/12/9474.aspx

I don't own an Xbox, but I've always intended to buy an Xbox 360 for a client to my Media Center PC if nothing else.  I'm very pleased that Microsoft allowed the Xbox 360 to play many of the Xbox games.

11/13/2005 7:28:40 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, September 08, 2005

Dan Tull has created a wonderful Sudoku tool that makes Hard Sudoku puzzles less tedious, and Tough Sudoku puzzles possible!

You need to provide your own puzzle values, which is just takes a few double clicks and then you are off.  It basically does the grunt work of eliminating the obvious impossible values for you.

It could take hours of tedious re-evaluation to solve a tough puzzle manually and tough puzzles seem to require some guess and check as well.  With the tool, the re-evaluation is mostly free and guess is check is made much easier with the "Copy Puzzle" feature.

The tool is a Javascript application supported on IE, Firefox, and Safari.  The Copy Puzzle feature doesn't currently work in IE however.

Excellent work all around Dan, Thanks!  I'm still addicted, but at least I waste less time per day doing the harder puzzles.  :)

9/8/2005 4:38:23 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
 Saturday, August 13, 2005

My step-father-in-law introduced me to Sudoku logic puzzles last weekend and I've been compulsively obsessed ever since.   Here's the URL:

http://www.sudoku.com.au/

There are 3 new puzzles every day, one easy, one medium, and one hard.  The easy ones I can do in less than 5 minutes.  The hard ones I try to finish in less than 20 minutes, but I've spent over an hour on them before.

These puzzles have everything about logic puzzles that I loved as a kid without most of the bad parts.  There is no math to do, yet it's number oriented.  Most of the work is "process of elimination" oriented.  It's very visually stimulating.

The biggest downside I've noticed so far is the first ~10 minutes of grunt work that goes into a hard puzzle.  Being a programmer, I'd love to just code up an algorithm to do a first pass analysis for me which would save a ton of time, and eliminate the normal human mistakes.  I'm not sure how that would affect the "fun factor" though.

8/13/2005 6:41:06 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 
 Friday, August 05, 2005

I saw the announcement on The Inquirer.  I was a huge fan of the first version (I liked it much more than Diablo II, which was an excellent game in its own right), so I assume I'll buy this one even if I don't have much time to play it.

Microsoft is listing the release date for the game as August 16th.  W00t!

8/5/2005 4:50:31 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, June 30, 2005

The PDF containing the AMD-Intel Complaint

I have been an AMD shareholder for the past ~6 years (shortly after AMD successfully launched the first Athlon processor).  I read a decent majority of the complaint linked above.  It makes me want to cry.

AMD has apparently been working very hard to be successful and Intel has apparently been working very hard to stealthily kill AMD's chances to increase market share in the face of AMD's technical superiority across many mass market product lines.  It's amazing how much of the plot AMD has reverse engineered.  I'm sure it has taken years for AMD to gather all the information it has about Intel's intentionally stealthy plots.  Hopefully, legal discovery will allow AMD to much more quickly build a lengthy fact filled case against Intel.  If I was an Intel shareholder (i.e. naturally biased against AMD) and the judge for this case, I would be pretty persuaded to AMD's cause just by reading the complaint which is very damning of Intel.

I want to cry because over the last 5 years instead of seeing my AMD stock increase in value, I was (on paper) down ~90% at one point in time.  If it turns out that was because of Intel doing very illegal things, I will be very angry.  I did sell some of my AMD stock during the last 5 years and that sale was at a price that was (theoretically) lower than it would have been had Intel been (allegedly) competing in a legal and legitimate way.  I don't think there is any way for me to be compensated for that loss though (the Enron shareholders obviously had it MUCH worse; I am starting to feel their pain).

I guess now is a good time for me to put my money behind my beliefs.  I'd love to short Intel to zero.  :)

6/30/2005 4:55:52 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Wednesday, June 29, 2005

AMD sues Intel, the monopolist

Wow.  I would guess that AMD has been preparing this lawsuit for years.  There have been rumors of this kind of behavior by Intel for a long time.  As an AMD shareholder, I can't help but be thrilled.  If AMD wins no money from the lawsuit, that is fine with me.  If it causes massive increases in their market share because customers aren't afraid to buy from them anymore, that would be fabulous.  If the status quo remains after the lawsuit ends, oh well, the lawyers drained some of AMD's profits away.  There seems to be little downside risk and tremendous upside potential.  Go AMD!

6/29/2005 5:28:18 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |